good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re^2: Context, pedantry and appropriate response.by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Jan 02, 2016 at 18:44 UTC ( [id://1151712]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Which is why deliberately obtuse pedantic posts like this Wrong again! Then and now. I read the post; he was quoting the word process. My reasoning was: if this is a real process, why is he quoting it? If it isn't a process -- a thread or a subroutine -- then why not say that? Far from pedantry; I was seeking clarification. A necessity in order to be able to answer his question because capturing stdout/stderr from a process requires a different solution to capturing them from a thread. Not good at this are you. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Meditations
|
|