Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

by oiskuu (Hermit)
on May 06, 2016 at 16:19 UTC ( #1162368=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
in thread unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

What is consideration? gives the test: Don't consider a node unless you feel strongly that something specific should be done. That seems to be inherently somewhat subjective and capricious.

What makes one brief note with a link (say a pointer to some news) okay, while another rubs us the wrong way? Could it be we find shameless plugs deplorable? Could it be we dislike deliberate attempts to make us click and play fetch? Nay, methinks the "spam" designation was not far off the mark!

Furthermore, the repost does not strike me as a quality node either. Section of code that does not run. Link to identical content, offsite. Do you want me to click some external links, do you?

There is no substitute for editing. Not editing your nodes is disrespectful to your peers. Anybody interested in testing the code will need to fix it first. Not only are you delegating secretarial duties, you have everyone duplicate the effort.

What is spam?

  • Comment on Re^2: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
by Anonymous Monk on May 06, 2016 at 20:14 UTC

    "Section of code that does not run."

    Which section and why does it not run? (Isn't this statement a worse violation than anything else you're claiming.)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1162368]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2020-04-05 01:52 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    The most amusing oxymoron is:
















    Results (33 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?