Re: The significance of 2010-03-16?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: The significance of 2010-03-16? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 18, 2016 at 21:05 UTC
See the total at the bottom of http://perlmonks.com/?showspoiler=1163351-1;node_id=1163351. Further, this is a snip from a script that runs through the data from my stats page in date order totaling the scores and displaying them day by day. According to that, I reached my current listed total, 161809, by the 17th March 2010, and have to date accumulated 277470: `C:\test>Perlmonks.postsByDate.pl \| more 2002-06-04:[ 0] 0 2002-06-05:[ 23] 23 2002-06-06:[ 77] 100 ... 2010-03-16:[106] 161736 <<<<<<<<< 2010-03-17:[161] 161897 <<<<<<<<< 161809 occurred here 2010-03-18:[ 32] 161929 ... 2010-04-14:[204] 165092 -- More -- ... 2016-05-16:[106] 277437 2016-05-17:[ 22] 277459 2016-05-18:[ 11] 277470 low:-55 2005-09-03 high:373 2007-05-09` [download] It doesn't bother me -- hell, its taken me 6 years to even notice -- but I just wondered why? I also wonder which other site stats are wrong? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :) In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: The significance of 2010-03-16? (RTMF?) by tye (Sage) on May 18, 2016 at 22:28 UTC
Perhaps you should read some Monastery FAQs (or even recent threads in this very section) if you believe that (a user's) "Experience" is equal to "sum of Reputation over all nodes" (by that user). Or is my guess as to what your code is doing incorrect? - tye	[reply]
Re^4: The significance of 2010-03-16? (bugreport) by Anonymous Monk on May 19, 2016 at 02:21 UTC
Voting/Experience System has broken formatting, nodelets are at bottom of page	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: The significance of 2010-03-16? by 1nickt (Canon) on May 19, 2016 at 01:01 UTC
Be not dismayed! You have accumulated XP faster than anyone else and you're the top dog where it counts! [500]► perl XP_efficiency.pl -s age -l 10 -r 1 -m 500 -o desc -f + BrowserUk -f ikegami +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ \| Pos \| St. \| Monk name \| XP \| Level \| Age \| XP/Age \| +Posts \| XP/Posts \| +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ \| 1 2 BrowserUk 161,811 Pope (28) 5,097 36.1627 +22,676 7.0234 \| \| 2 3 ikegami 128,087 Pope (28) 4,299 33.9025 +19,773 6.3692 \| \| 3 4 Corion 126,232 Pope (28) 5,909 24.1447 +10,471 11.7732 \| \| 4 8 moritz 65,845 Cardinal (24) 3,285 22.6170 + 6,420 10.0004 \| \| 5 46 Athanasius 27,462 Canon (20) 1,478 20.9184 + 1,571 17.0102 \| \| 6 5 GrandFather 73,558 Sage (25) 4,005 20.6742 + 6,639 10.7781 \| \| 7 37 choroba 31,840 Chancellor (21) 2,238 15.8848 + 3,961 7.7559 \| \| 8 424 1nickt 4,603 Priest (14) 340 15.0575 + 634 6.9921 \| \| 9 19 toolic 43,883 Bishop (22) 3,256 15.0187 + 3,647 11.5862 \| \| 10 99 Laurent_R 16,585 Abbot (19) 1,347 13.6652 + 2,211 7.1965 \| +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ [501]► perl XP_efficiency.pl -s posts -l 10 -r 1 -m 500 -o desc +-f BrowserUk -f ikegami +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ \| Pos \| St. \| Monk name \| XP \| Level \| Age \| XP/Age \| +Posts \| XP/Posts \| +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ \| 1 17 Old_Gray_Bear 47,530 Bishop (22) 4,632 11.2955 + 607 74.4876 \| \| 2 31 Gavin 33,243 Chancellor (21) 3,725 9.7490 + 600 52.3008 \| \| 3 44 borisz 27,946 Canon (20) 4,882 6.0461 + 913 27.9354 \| \| 4 57 FunkyMonk 25,075 Canon (20) 3,313 8.1805 + 1,024 22.8696 \| \| 5 83 Happy-the-mon 18,570 Abbot (19) 5,204 3.5514 + 709 22.5219 \| \| 6 39 eyepopslikeam 30,907 Chancellor (21) 5,078 6.4648 + 1,314 21.5890 \| \| 7 128 vinoth.ree 12,865 Monsignor (18) 2,690 4.9555 + 567 20.3175 \| \| 8 108 atcroft 15,511 Monsignor (18) 5,518 2.6744 + 650 19.6185 \| \| 9 9 Ovid 60,582 Cardinal (24) 5,823 11.4612 + 3,001 19.2171 \| \| 10 144 flexvault 11,854 Prior (17) 2,697 4.5078 + 601 17.4800 \| \| 66 2 BrowserUk 161,811 Pope (28) 5,097 36.1627 +22,676 7.0234 \| \| 71 3 ikegami 128,087 Pope (28) 4,299 33.9025 +19,773 6.3692 \| +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +-----------------+ [download] The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: The significance of 2010-03-16? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 19, 2016 at 01:24 UTC
If I was here for, or paid any relevance to those numbers, 7.0234/post instead the 12.25/post I get might dismay me. As is, bad math and worst justifictions just leave a bad taste. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :) In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]


Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot
	PerlMonks