Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Jun 13, 2016 at 22:48 UTC ( #1165516=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies
in thread Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies

Also, whilst trying to re-create the problem, I discovered a different (PM) bug.

When viewing this thread from the OP down, this post shows a reputation of 4; but when I view the post on its own, it shows a reputation of 0?


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Not understood.
  • Comment on Re^5: Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies (serious bug)
by tye (Sage) on Jun 14, 2016 at 00:56 UTC
    Also, whilst trying to re-create the problem, I discovered a different (PM) bug.

    Yep, I can confirm that. My current guess is that factoring out the display of the reputation managed to have the reputation being fetched in a context such that it is being fetched from the wrong thing. Though my quick attempts to guess at what that wrong thing might be failed, so I could just be wrong.

    Update: Okay, trying again in a context where I had more access to information, my first guess was actually right.

    - tye        

Re^6: Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies
by jdporter (Canon) on Jun 14, 2016 at 11:59 UTC

    Thank you all for the bug report(s). Fixed.

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
Re^6: Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies (bug)
by beech (Parson) on Jun 14, 2016 at 07:52 UTC
    Hi, I see a vote issue as well, when I go to Perl Monks Discussion to upvote new questions, I see Reputation: 0 for all the questions I just upvoted, this is not their true reputation, if I click to view the actual node, a non-zero number is shown

    update:

    Viewing this node through its parent shows Reputation: 5 (no significant downvotes) which is impossible since I just posted the node

    Curiously 5 is also the parents reputation

Re^6: Editing your writeup is now a separate action from viewing a thread and voting on replies
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Jun 13, 2016 at 22:50 UTC

    And indeed, when I viewed the entire thread immediately after posting the above post, it showed a rep of 4; viewing directly showed 0 as expected.

    Summat's hooky.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Not understood.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1165516]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2019-12-11 05:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?