Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: CamelCase really that bad?

by zwon (Abbot)
on Aug 25, 2016 at 21:35 UTC ( #1170498=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: CamelCase really that bad?
in thread CamelCase really that bad?

You see one used more than the other, so one is the standard camelCase

After spending a lot of time on research (maybe even 5 minutes), I couldn't actually remember/find a single module that uses any camel case. So I guess the standard is not to use it ;)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: CamelCase really that bad?
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 25, 2016 at 22:21 UTC

    After spending a lot of time on research (maybe even 5 minutes), I couldn't actually remember/find a single module that uses any camel case. So I guess the standard is not to use it ;)

    Follow the link provided and you can see a small sample

    Also look at the list of core modules, FileHandle, FindBin, I18N::LangTags, Tie::Array, its all the SameCamel

      Those modules are not using camel case for methods at all. For package names there was no question from my side.
      Follow the link provided and you can see a small sample
      You mean the link to the wikipedia page which states that the standard in Perl is "Locally scoped variables and subroutine names are lowercase with infix underscores." and not camelCase?
      A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1170498]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2020-06-05 19:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you really want to know if there is extraterrestrial life?



    Results (40 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?