good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Abuse of "or next" in expressions and "next" that returns valueby AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) |
on Jul 18, 2018 at 21:01 UTC ( [id://1218788]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I can't comment on the internals of the deparser, but... ... to me, the #2 is more readable ... Everyone has their own notion of what is understandable and readable. To me, fragment 1 is way more readable, understandable and maintainable — today, tomorrow, in a year, in a decade. The only circumstance in which I might deploy something like fragment 2 is if the simple-seeming code of fragment 1 actually harbored some perverse and devilish subtlety that I did not trust myself to convey clearly in a comment (or if I didn't trust the maintainers to pay attention to comments). In such a case, I might write my code in such a way as to bring casual perusal to a screeching halt and cause a reader to proceed only with the greatest trepidation and attention to each detail; a huge mental speed-bump as it were. But I normally try to avoid writing speed-bumpy code. Update: A few minor wording changes. Give a man a fish: <%-{-{-{-<
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|