Re: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by swl (Parson) on Oct 04, 2018 at 21:59 UTC
I think the absence of the par-xxx path(s) in @INC is a key symptom. Does your code modify @INC in any way? What happens if you build an executable that only prints @INC? Like this (adjusting quote chars as needed for linux): `pp -C -e "print join q{ }, @INC"` [download] If I run it on my windows machine using PAR::Packer 1.047, I get the result below. Note the absence of any of the lib dirs from the perl it was built with. `a.exe C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\par-736861776e\temp-21884\inc\lib C:\ +Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\par-736861776e\temp-21884\inc CODE(0x38 +59d88) CODE(0x385a310)` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by swl (Parson) on Oct 04, 2018 at 22:36 UTC
The first line of the error also raises questions. `Invalid argument at -e line 119.` [download] Can you provide the full text of the pp command you are calling? And, a bit more speculatively, does your code call `system perl` anywhere?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by dkhosla1 (Sexton) on Oct 06, 2018 at 00:17 UTC
No, I don't call 'system perl' anywhere and the command is: `pp -C -M Net::OpenSSH::ShellQuoter::POSIX -M arybase -o mytest mytest.pl` Yes - the first line is coming from somewhere outside my code. It almost seems like some race condition where the cleanup is happening before any code can execute (or it did but by the time it did some cleanup had already occurred..). The par-temp directory does get created and is empty as expected. Removing the -C works like a charm.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by swl (Parson) on Oct 06, 2018 at 06:59 UTC
Re^6: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by dkhosla1 (Sexton) on Oct 06, 2018 at 13:50 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^5: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by Anonymous Monk on Oct 06, 2018 at 00:42 UTC
Re^6: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by dkhosla1 (Sexton) on Oct 06, 2018 at 04:48 UTC
Re^3: Pelr packer pp with -C fails else ok by dkhosla1 (Sexton) on Oct 06, 2018 at 00:10 UTC
No, I don't modify @INC anywhere. I will try build a binary to just print @INC and report early next week.	[reply]


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks