Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot

Re: Editor / IDE Consolidation

by Anonymous Monk
on Aug 25, 2002 at 20:17 UTC ( #192715=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Editor / IDE Consolidation

Heard of (yes) Should you edit the platform for pico among others? (yes) Should you add nano to the list? (yes)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Editor / IDE Consolidation
by jordanh (Chaplain) on Aug 26, 2002 at 16:44 UTC

    Yes, and Cygwin removes (or helps to alleviate) this criticism:

    "I tried the windows port, but it just loses so much without the shell power of Linux."

    of using Emacs in a Windows environment.

    All in all, an interesting comparison matrix, though. I'd like to see this maintained with links to pages of pro/con comments for each.

      This is exactly the reason I prefer EMACS on win32. Eshell comes as close as possible (for me at least) to the Unix shell. The thing I like so much about eshell above dos and 4dos is screen scrolling. I wonder why Active State doesn't bundle XEMACS with Perl. That's my $.02.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://192715]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2020-11-30 04:57 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found