Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Editor / IDE Consolidation

by jordanh (Chaplain)
on Aug 26, 2002 at 16:44 UTC ( #192937=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Editor / IDE Consolidation
in thread Editor / IDE Consolidation

Yes, and Cygwin removes (or helps to alleviate) this criticism:

"I tried the windows port, but it just loses so much without the shell power of Linux."

of using Emacs in a Windows environment.

All in all, an interesting comparison matrix, though. I'd like to see this maintained with links to pages of pro/con comments for each.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Editor / IDE Consolidation
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 27, 2002 at 02:04 UTC
    This is exactly the reason I prefer EMACS on win32. Eshell comes as close as possible (for me at least) to the Unix shell. The thing I like so much about eshell above dos and 4dos is screen scrolling. I wonder why Active State doesn't bundle XEMACS with Perl. That's my $.02.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://192937]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (7)
As of 2020-12-03 08:21 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How often do you use taint mode?





    Results (53 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?