![]() |
|
P is for Practical | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: How far Open Source has come...by phydeauxarff (Priest) |
on Jul 18, 2003 at 02:26 UTC ( [id://275480]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
We have long faced some of the same concerns and I think I can sum up my position on open-source as a positive as... Open-Source doesn't mean we have to develop in-house...we can hire contractors, big companies, whatever to get us a 'commercially viable' system to perform the business functions that we need, but.... At the end of the day, if the system that we have someone develop or we purchase is based on open-source technologies that gives our company much more flexibility in the long-term, which is especially desirable in an environ where companies seem to be evaporating on a regular basis. With open-source based systems if I decide that I am unhappy with a vendor, contractor, or whomever delivered the system to me, I can fire them and hire another contractor, vendor or even move it in-house to my own group of employees if it best fits my business needs. This is the ultimate application of the Darwin Principle to business....the companies that serve my need must do so on the merits of their abilities, not because I have become dependant on proprietary technologies they delivered to me and migrating from them would cost me more than staying... And that, is my ten cents, my two cents is free.
In Section
Meditations
|
|