|go ahead... be a heretic|
RE (tilly) 2: Handling cascading defaults (abstraction is great!)by tilly (Archbishop)
|on Aug 20, 2000 at 08:07 UTC||Need Help??|
(Posted based on private conversation with tye.)
To me the key concept is abstraction layers. Perl offers a lot of ways to create an abstraction layer. As long as you have and think in terms of abstraction layers you will find cascading defaults trivial to implement.
I have found this to be true even if the abstraction layer is something as simple as storing stuff in a hash. (Start it at the default, then overlay changes in hash slices.) The second pass at an OO answer in RE (tilly) 4: Handling cascading defaults shows this kind of abstraction allowing the over-riding of defaults set during your constructor in a method call. (OK, that was in an OO example, but the principle of how I cascaded that time was not OO specific.)
Another form of abstraction is provided by using references to subs rather than subs directly. OO is yet another. All of these can solve cascading defaults quite smoothly, for the same basic reason - your code goes through a level of indirection which anything you want can be overridden in.
Now what does OO provide above and beyond abstraction? Well it provides an entire mental framework for how to organize your thoughts about problems. For some people this fits well. For others it doesn't. I am a person who is both competent at thinking that way but doesn't particularly enjoy it or find it a natural fit. (YMMV of course!) I don't want to track down the link, but at IWETHEY we had a conversation about this once. I thought that OO reminded me very much of an area of math called category theory, both of which I disliked. Ironically someone else there knew both, agreed they were similar, and liked both of them. :-)
I won't give a detailed critique of my feelings. Most of it wouldn't make sense to most people here because I compare it to my experiences with graduate level math, which is probably not a particularly common experience base in these parts. :-)
However if you look at what I write you will find that for me abstraction layers are a theme that comes up quite often as a motivating principle. You also see it in some of my favorite links, such as Linus on Portability (linked on my home node).