in reply to Re: Just another Bach Hacker
in thread Just another Bach Hacker
Not by hand, I suppose.Actually, this one was all done by hand (as opposed to Just Another Larry, where I freely admit to using a tool to get my initial picture :)). I *looked* at some generated-ASCII-art as a starting point for the formatting, but with something like this (where, as halley says, the code is using compulsory whitespace etc.) it's near-impossible to automate. You just have to fiddle around until it fits. If you look carefully, you'll see there's lots of 'cheating' going on - the '+' sign in the middle of the downstroke for instance (where I would have loved to have been able to stick another 'sub' or 'for'), or the 'print join' in the tail...an automatic version would presumably have found a better 'fit'.
Glad you liked it,
Ben.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Just another Bach Hacker
by chimni (Pilgrim) on Sep 10, 2003 at 04:51 UTC | |
by naChoZ (Curate) on Sep 10, 2003 at 19:32 UTC | |
Re: Re: Re: Just another Bach Hacker
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Sep 18, 2003 at 15:20 UTC |
In Section
Obfuscated Code