Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?

by petesmiley (Friar)
on Nov 11, 2003 at 16:53 UTC ( #306259=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
in thread Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?

++ This is very accurate for me as well. I've done a bit fork programming and a bit of thread programming. Sharing data with forks has always struck me as "funky".

I have another good reason to use threads. According to the threads doc, fork under windows is a hack using threads. Many of my programs run on Windows. I believe this sometimes led to "funky" (seemingly unforkish) behavior when I tried to use forks.

As listed in the threads doc:

Prior to perl 5.8 this has only been available to people embedding perl and for emulating fork() on windows.

So I pretty much just use threads now when I program for something that will run under windows. Thankfully, the memory leaks are being weeded out :) It would be really nice to get the best out of both worlds with threads, but I suppose it will just take time to polish it.

smiles

  • Comment on Re: Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://306259]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2020-04-01 05:21 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    To "Disagree to disagree" means to:









    Results (186 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?