Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: No Anonymous Reply Option

by Itatsumaki (Friar)
on Nov 25, 2003 at 08:21 UTC ( #309834=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: No Anonymous Reply Option
in thread No Anonymous Reply Option

Hi again zengargoyle,

Your words about organizational inertia are well-worth considering. But before I get to that, let me reiterate the point I have been making all along: I didn't get into this debate because I feel it is imperative to protect AnonyMonk. The problem I have with your argument is that you never state the possibility that the removal the ability to be anonymous may damage the quality of the site.

As for institutional inertia, I see your point. Nonetheless, the arguments against telnet are convincing, quantifiable, and easily demonstrable. Those against anonymous posting do not have that level of rigour. In fact, good luck ever reaching the standard you've set yourself with that analogy.

Most internet sites are overwhelmed with noise. Consider EE or newsgroups for examples. There are two ways to deal with that problem. One is to keep out the noise, the other is to keep in the signal. The proposals you are making are directed at the former without regard to possible impacts on the latter: that's the logical weakness I've been trying to point out.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://309834]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2020-05-29 10:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    If programming languages were movie genres, Perl would be:















    Results (169 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?