Welcome to the Monastery | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
"Dismissal under a catch-all term as a micro-optimisation suggests that the designers were wrong." I disagree. I interpret that to mean "use with caution". eduardo knows me. He asked me a damn good question and i answered with my opinion. No where did anybody say that the designers of Perl should be "embroiled, confused and kept in the quagmire" for adding the o modifier."Add this to the list of other perl features equally dismissed in this place as being non-useful ..." Who said obfuscation is non-useful? :POh, and even if you didn't directly direct the comment at me, you did so indirectly by replying directly to me. :) (one self-ascribed expert ... oooookay) Sigh ... all of this bitterness ... i think it's PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!!!jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat) In reply to (jeffa) 2Re: Opinionated, yet anonymous...?
by jeffa
|
|