Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
DamnDirtyApe,
Or am I missing something? Not really. You would have to modify it only slightly to allow argument passing. The big difference is that with: You get the benefit of not having to remember how many/which objects (which could be of different classes) are in the merged object. It also becomes a heck of a lot easier depending on how many times you want to bark at the moon. This is why I do not think my second example would be desireable to the person asking either. Keep in mind I am not suggesting a new module for CPAN by any stretch of the imagination - just something to help someone who asked. Cheers - L~RIn reply to Re: Re: Method Calls on multiple objects
by Limbic~Region
|
|