comment on

Can anyone commont on DBIx::Class? I'm asking because this is one of the two main models supported by perl's shiny new web framework, Catalyst. (At least, it's featured as one of two on the Wiki.)

Since Class::DBI, which is the basis of the other supported Catalyst model CDBI::Crud, got a lot of flack on this thread, I'm looking to get opinions on

1) if you get most of the sweetness of DBIx::Simple with DBIx::Class

2) Is DBIx:Class stable enough to use in your Catalyst dev (it's listed as experimental)

If DBIx::Class is judged too immature, how much sacrifice would it be to use DBIx::Simple in your catalyst apps instead of DBIx::Class.

In reply to Re: A brief survey of the DBI usability layer modules on the CPAN by tphyahoo
in thread A brief survey of the DBI usability layer modules on the CPAN by Aristotle

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Think about Loose Coupling
	PerlMonks