comment on

Interesting. Though from the first graph my initial question is what happened on Perl Monks, in the Perl community or in the programming world at large in November 2005?

That seem to be a turning point of sorts.

Update: For fun I trolled through Super Search.

Hmmm...

I used to be a saint and A Level Playing Field -- this is kind of interesting, actually
Are we a dying breed? -- a general trend? (not this post specifically)
Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)
"Perl is the Cobol of the WWW"

Some things I don't think are responsible :-) (Sometimes picked for title more than content)

-xdg

Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.

In reply to Re^2: Are monks hibernating? by xdg
in thread Are monks hibernating? by BrowserUk

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks