Re^4: Quantum Weirdness and the Increment Operator

[ihb]

Right, my point was that one shouldn't read documentation. sigh

I could try to explain my point again more clearly, but I don't know how.

Enlightenment is welcomed, but the answer to the question is clear, it is documented. It is written in plain English for all to see.

And I wrote my argumentation in plain English for you to see, but you still didn't get it. And that's the problem, isn't it? What's clear for you may not be clear to someone else.

If you take the time to read my post again, please read it in the context of Abigail-II's reply. Argumentation is always in a context.

ihb