Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: Solving compositional problems with Perl 6 rolesby dragonchild (Archbishop) |
on Aug 23, 2004 at 12:16 UTC ( [id://385067]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Actually, I think that your attempt at humor was actually a good idea, in disguise. I can see where one would like roles to be exclusionary - if $foo does X, that means you cannot have $foo does Y, so there should be a way of specifying that in the definitions of X and Y. But, as I said earlier, this is starting to sound like Prolog. (Not necessarily a bad thing, mind you ...)
------
Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested
In Section
Meditations
|
|