In unix, man perl works as expected. In Windows, ActivePerl installs HTML documentation and I think it creates a shortcut to it. perl.com, perl.org and ActiveState.com all have HTML versions of the documentation. Am I missing something?
| [reply] [d/l] |
I don't think you or BUU are missing anything except the perspective of the newly arrived immigrant. Perl has a great doc base but I didn't know about any of it till I'd been coding perl for almost a year. It's nobody's fault, it's that Perl attracts those who don't have a programming background. Many of the hackers here are computer scientists and engineers but a lot of the hackers in perl at large are English majors, designers, linguists, biologists, etc who, being self-taught, may well have never heard of "man" or "perldoc" and don't know where to turn for help besides the top matches on Google for perl like, unfortunately, Matt's Script Archive.
| [reply] |
You say "top matches on google", but when I do a search for "perl" on google just now, my top matches are:
- Perl.com
- Perl.org
- Cpan
- Activestate
- Perldoc.com
All of which have links to online documentation. Are these links not good enough? Are they hard to find?
| [reply] |