Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot

Re: named arguments

by etcshadow (Priest)
on Nov 21, 2004 at 17:20 UTC ( #409386=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to named arguments

I've actually adopted the reverse. It's not a question of when to use named arguments, it's a matter of when not to. That is: assume that all subs take named arguments, and you really have to convince me if a particular subroutine should have positional arguments.

When you're managing a very large project that is constantly growing and changing, it's frankly the only way. Where I work we've actually got a whole slew of code conventions that center around making code future-change friendly, and this is the center-piece of them. Among the others are: giving all key-value pairs their own line, giving all array values their own line, and always putting (unnecessary) trailing commas on list and hash declarations. The point being: diffs and merges only affect the lines that actually changed semantically, and highlite what the actual change is.

------------ :Wq Not an editor command: Wq

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: named arguments
by drewbie (Chaplain) on Nov 22, 2004 at 21:19 UTC
    It's not a question of when to use named arguments, it's a matter of when not to.
    ++ on the coding conventions. I have come to the same conclusion. It doesn't take many compile errors to get into the habit of including the trailing comma. :-) Getting highly relevant & informative diffs is a nice gift too.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://409386]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2020-07-03 20:12 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found