Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Jan 18, 2005 at 12:38 UTC ( #423000=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers
in thread Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers

Personally I question the value of having Q&A work differently from the rest of the site. The section is probably best served by using the same internal structure (ie regular root nodes and notes like everywhere else), with a (configurably?) forced note depth of 1 when you look at the root node. Effectively that would work like the section does now: you see a question and only its direct answers. The major difference is that there would automatically be a some notes below your chosen depth indicator where there are replies to an answer.

Makeshifts last the longest.

  • Comment on Re^2: Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers
by ysth (Canon) on Jan 18, 2005 at 12:49 UTC
    And where does the category level fit into that? (Right now, categories have questions have answers have notes).

      It doesn't change at all. My proposal is categories have questions have notes. I simply got rid of the separate answers by having questions display their notes with a forced note depth of 1.

      Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://423000]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2021-05-16 20:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Perl 7 will be out ...





    Results (152 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?