Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Loose vs. Tight Coupling

by spurperl (Priest)
on May 02, 2005 at 05:13 UTC ( #453133=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Loose vs. Tight Coupling

The looseness of coupling versus performance is one of the most common, and often the most difficult decisions I make in my job as a programmer.

I *love* modular designs - they feel right for me. I like it when I can reuse a module - so much time saved ! I like thinking modularly, it simplifies the process and allows to build complex programs easily.

However, modularity often comes at the price of degraded performance. It's a basic fact of life, tighter coupling improves performance because of lessening the cost in the interfaces.

The best solution to this problem, IMHO, is the common engineering trade-off. I tend to design modularly, then profile. Wherever the performance matters most (remember those 80/20 rules) I tighten the coupling.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://453133]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (3)
As of 2021-09-23 02:51 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?