Re: Net::HTTPServer wrapped CGI::Application

Hmm, now that I figured out how to turn an HTTP::Request into a CGI object, and the response back into an HTTP::Response, it wouldn't take much more wiring to create CGI::Prototype::Server, a standalone web server for CGI::Prototype applications. Cool.

I'm pretty sure that's going on the todo list.

Comment on Re: Net::HTTPServer wrapped CGI::Application

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Net::HTTPServer wrapped CGI::Application by brian_d_foy (Abbot) on May 18, 2005 at 17:38 UTC
Once you add a default webmail application, your journey to the dark side will be complete. It would be really cool to let a user-agent do stately things, like tell the app "Let's do this part as SOAP" or "Hey, gimme XML with a side of gzip". That should be really easy stuff. Can we name it Naviho? :) -- brian d foy <brian@stonehenge.com>	[reply]
Re^3: Net::HTTPServer wrapped CGI::Application by jfroebe (Parson) on May 18, 2005 at 17:44 UTC
Just curious... why naviho? (spelling is Navajo btw.) Jason L. Froebe Team Sybase member No one has seen what you have seen, and until that happens, we're all going to think that you're nuts. - Jack O'Neil, Stargate SG-1	[reply]
Re^4: Net::HTTPServer wrapped CGI::Application by brian_d_foy (Abbot) on May 18, 2005 at 17:52 UTC
Well, "navi" comes from "navigation", which is loosely connected to what we do with web pages, and the rest I'll let you figure out since this is a family forum. :) I'm not sure why you think the spelling should be the same as the native american tribe since I'm not talking about them. I'm naming a new web server, so I can spell it any way I choose. :) -- brian d foy <brian@stonehenge.com>	[reply]
Re^5: Net::HTTPServer wrapped CGI::Application by jfroebe (Parson) on May 18, 2005 at 17:55 UTC