Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

by jdporter (Paladin)
on Jun 22, 2005 at 16:42 UTC ( [id://469084]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

Argh! I can't believe people are calling those things "tags". They're keywords, for Jah's sake! Not to mention that "tag" already means something else in the same domain!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags
by The Mad Hatter (Priest) on Jun 22, 2005 at 16:53 UTC
    What's the difference? And would you suggest I use a different term in the module name even though "tag" is the popular term?

      It's not so much that there's a difference, but rather, that people should use different terms for different things, and should continue to use a single well established term for a single thing.

      I think you should consider using the term "keywords" unless it will seriously hinder comprehension and adoption by your target audience.

        If using the word "keywords" will confuse the target audience, then the target audience is far too stupid for you to want to target them with anything less than the Black Death.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://469084]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-06-21 10:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?
    erzuuli‥ 🛈The London Perl and Raku Workshop takes place on 26th Oct 2024. If your company depends on Perl, please consider sponsoring and/or attending.