Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Namespace suggestions

by webfiend (Vicar)
on Nov 17, 2005 at 22:56 UTC ( #509628=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Namespace suggestions

Your application is very narrow, so the namespace makes sense to me. It obviously describes a progressively more specific domain. It also leaves a lot of room for other modules which might fit somewhere else within that range. The name can't possibly be ugly if it correctly describes the purpose. Okay, maybe a name could be ugly, but I don't think that this is a valid example of ugliness.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Namespace suggestions
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Nov 17, 2005 at 23:11 UTC
    Thanks for the feedback. I don't think it's that bad, but something doesn't sit right about it. Perhaps it's because it's
    device::protocol::device::interface.

    Maybe Device::VCR::SSSP::Serial would be better.

    Perhaps I'm overthinking it.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://509628]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (5)
As of 2021-01-23 05:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Notices?