Re^2: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by Argel (Prior) on Jan 09, 2006 at 21:14 UTC
What about the following? () Publish As Is () Publish After Editing/Moving () Reap () Abstain -- Argel	[reply]
Re^4: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by GrandFather (Saint) on Jan 10, 2006 at 04:42 UTC
too verbose DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel	[reply]
Re^5: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by Argel (Prior) on Jan 11, 2006 at 20:58 UTC
Okay, how about this? Publish? () As Is () After Editing () Reap () Abstain -- Argel	[reply]
Re^4: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 13, 2006 at 01:26 UTC
That’s misworded. The node is already published. The question you are answering is “what action should the janitors take on this node?“ If there should be any changes, I’d vote for changing “keep” to “leave,” and maybe also for changing “edit” to “fix,” but I don’t know that the labels really need changing. Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re^5: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by tye (Sage) on Jan 13, 2006 at 08:42 UTC
If I vote 'leave', when can I come back? Or does it make the node leave? Would 'fix'ing a node prevent it from moving between sections or prevent it from reproducing? I much prefer 'keep' over 'leave'. Even though it isn't perfect, I find it easy to read 'keep it there' or 'keep it as-is'. Hey, perhaps 'as-is' would be a good replacement? Or is that more difficult for some non-native speakers? I also much prefer 'edit' over 'fix' but would support going to 'modify'. 'abstain' would be fine with me as well. - tye	[reply]
Re^6: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 13, 2006 at 10:47 UTC


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks