Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^3: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

by Argel (Prior)
on Jan 09, 2006 at 21:14 UTC ( #522044=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider
in thread Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

What about the following?
() Publish As Is  () Publish After Editing/Moving  () Reap  () Abstain

-- Argel

  • Comment on Re^3: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider
by GrandFather (Saint) on Jan 10, 2006 at 04:42 UTC

    too verbose

    DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel
      Okay, how about this?

      Publish?  () As Is   () After Editing   () Reap   () Abstain

      -- Argel

Re^4: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 13, 2006 at 01:26 UTC

    That’s misworded. The node is already published. The question you are answering is “what action should the janitors take on this node?“

    If there should be any changes, I’d vote for changing “keep” to “leave,” and maybe also for changing “edit” to “fix,” but I don’t know that the labels really need changing.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

      If I vote 'leave', when can I come back? Or does it make the node leave? Would 'fix'ing a node prevent it from moving between sections or prevent it from reproducing?

      I much prefer 'keep' over 'leave'. Even though it isn't perfect, I find it easy to read 'keep it there' or 'keep it as-is'. Hey, perhaps 'as-is' would be a good replacement? Or is that more difficult for some non-native speakers?

      I also much prefer 'edit' over 'fix' but would support going to 'modify'.

      'abstain' would be fine with me as well.

      - tye        

        “Abstain” over “nada” would be excellent – it always bugged me that “nada” seems to imply a vote for doing nothing, rather than no vote at all.

        “Modify” sounds like a clear improvement over “edit” and “fix,” as well; in fact, so much so that I now feel inclined to say it needs changing.

        I don’t like “as is” much because it’s not a verb. My quibble with “keep” is linguistic hair-splitting: keeping a node implies an active preserving action, whereas the meaning of the vote is for the janitors to passively take none. “Leave alone” would express this exactly, but is a bit long. I follow the argument that shortening it to “leave” makes it too imprecise, though. Hey, for “leave alone,” the thesaurus lists “let be;” does that seem palatable?

        The options would then be as follows:

        ☐ Let be   ☐ Modify   ☐ Reap   ☐ Abstain

        I quite like the look of that – it’s only slightly longer than what we have now, and much more precise.

        Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://522044]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (7)
As of 2022-05-23 16:03 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?

    Results (82 votes). Check out past polls.