Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re: Implicit loop counter

by Dominus (Parson)
on Mar 12, 2000 at 23:43 UTC ( #5264=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Implicit loop counter

I keep thinking that it wouldn't be so hard to add this. Of course, there's the question of what to call it, but I imagined that it would be OK to name it ${^Index}, and then have a pragma like use index; that would alias ${^Index} to $# so that you could just call it $#. Another possibility is that you could just use $# directlry---I have a suspicion that there is no program anywhere that actually uses $# at present.

To get it to work, you would need to arrange that any for block that contained a mention of ${^Index} would have a special lexical variable allocated on its pad. You would also need to have an index in the OP node for the for block that pointed to this pad entry. Then each time through the loop, Perl would look at the index, and if it was defined, would increment the referred-to variable.

The downside of all this is that it might slow down all loops, even those that didn't use ${^Index}, because they would have to look to see if it was there at run time. However, if the for code already keeps an iteration counter around (this is possible, although I haven't checked) one might be able to borrow it for free, or almost for free.

It would probably be a good project for an intermediate guts hacker. I've had it on my to-do list for a long time, but I never get around to doing it. Maybe it'll be ready for 5.7.

an iteration counter

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://5264]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (10)
As of 2018-06-23 11:19 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (125 votes). Check out past polls.