Do you have coverity scan of perl/Tk? Show me
Did you ever looked into perl/Tk source tree?
Its a mess. First file that now I looked at, the file './VERSIONS' in perl/Tk-804.027 say
This is Tk402.001
The name by the way is Tcl/Tk's 4.2 with three digits for me to mess w
+ith.
I hope Sun don't get through more than 100 revisions so two sub-versio
+n digits
will be enough for them.
I will subsume Sun's 'patch' stuff (e.g. '3' in 4.2p2) into my digits
+as we have
tended to be 'ahead' of them on some fixes and behind on others so we
+ don't
map exactly at that level.
For my digits I will use the 'even'=stable, 'odd'='experimental'
scheme that linux uses:
.0xx - inherently 'alpha'
.1xx - experimental 'beta'
.2xx - stable
.3xx - experimental
.4xx - stable
There are *many* such examples, just scratching the surface.
Do you think entire perl/Tk distribution is smooth and Coverity scan will be smooth??
About "perl/Tk language feels very perlish" - I agree.
Tcl::Tk supports perl/Tk syntax. So TIMTOWTDI is wider in Tcl::Tk, thus Tcl::Tk is even more perlish :):)
|