Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?

by Jenda (Abbot)
on Aug 27, 2006 at 16:04 UTC ( #569880=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?
in thread OT: Rewrite or Refactor?

What do you expect to gain from the XML-RPC?!? Apart from the need of beefier hardware. Do you need to be able to run those three layers on separate servers (using several computers for the same layer even)? Maybe there is a good reason, I'm just curious.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?
by badaiaqrandista (Pilgrim) on Aug 27, 2006 at 20:32 UTC

    Yes I need them to run on different servers. I'll probably make up my own communication protocol instead of the XML-based protocols. It's still up for discussion. As long as I can port this old architecture to the new one with the least risk as possible, I don't care how each layer communicate with each other.

    -cheepy-
      SOAP::Lite comes to mind for internal communication. Because it installs proxy-objects that can be used like the real ones. So is largely no modification required for communication.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://569880]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (7)
As of 2020-10-20 11:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:












    Results (210 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?