Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine

Re^4: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?

by badaiaqrandista (Pilgrim)
on Aug 27, 2006 at 20:32 UTC ( #569898=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?
in thread OT: Rewrite or Refactor?

Yes I need them to run on different servers. I'll probably make up my own communication protocol instead of the XML-based protocols. It's still up for discussion. As long as I can port this old architecture to the new one with the least risk as possible, I don't care how each layer communicate with each other.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: OT: Rewrite or Refactor?
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 30, 2006 at 13:56 UTC
    SOAP::Lite comes to mind for internal communication. Because it installs proxy-objects that can be used like the real ones. So is largely no modification required for communication.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://569898]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (7)
As of 2020-10-20 12:28 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:

    Results (210 votes). Check out past polls.