Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

by andreas1234567 (Vicar)
on Nov 25, 2006 at 19:59 UTC ( [id://586045]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?
in thread DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

.. spending three days (well, three shifts) figuring out how on earth this set of inter-related stored procedures work. And he's still not confident changing them that he won't break anything.
That sounds more like bad use of technology than bad technology itself.
SQL is designed for getting information from the database and putting information into the database.
Yes. But we're also discussing PL/SQL, which was designed to do a whole lot more than data retrieval.
Use the right tool for the job.
Exactly. And apparently when using Oracle, that will often involve PL/SQL.

Andreas
--
  • Comment on Re^2: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://586045]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-25 06:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found