Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options

Re^2: pod6 --- code+pod suggestion

by Eimi Metamorphoumai (Deacon)
on Dec 19, 2006 at 15:59 UTC ( #590689=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: pod6 --- code+pod suggestion
in thread pod6 --- code+pod suggestion

Though that's useful, that doesn't seem to be the same thing. The OP was asking for a way to have code embedded in the docs, and still be treated as code. What you're talking about seems to be a way to access the docs as data from within code. Now, you might be able to get there from here (read the docs, parse out the code, and run eval), but at the very best that's ugly.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: pod6 --- code+pod suggestion
by jdporter (Canon) on Dec 19, 2006 at 17:27 UTC

    Oh, yeah, you're right.

    In that case I think it's safe to say that RFC 79 was implicitly rejected, if not outright ignored.

    We're building the house of the future together.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://590689]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2020-10-24 17:37 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:

    Results (246 votes). Check out past polls.