Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Re: Re: Level Proposal

by arhuman (Vicar)
on Feb 23, 2001 at 02:29 UTC ( #60368=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Level Proposal
in thread Level Proposal

Why ?

  Beccause it's fun (at least some people(I'm among them) find it fun).

  Beccause it's natural to see higly skilled people to be in (always) higher level.

  Beccause soon some levels will become overcrowded.

  But my favourite reason is why not ?

As someone said on the CB (Jeffa?)it won't take anything to our beloved saints on the contrary those new level are mainly for them to enable them to stay 'on the top'...
In fact, IMHO, I don't see any drawback to this new system.
(Except, may be, for changing things, which isn't so bad for me).

UPDATE : I didn't make it clear in this post (but see my other post below) but the honorific titles are ok, for me.
new levels or new honorific title or whatever the form the idea is good !

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Level Proposal
by arturo (Vicar) on Feb 23, 2001 at 02:39 UTC

    Well, maybe I am cranky then, 'cos I don't see the fun.

    What I'm seeing is the claim that there's "saint inflation." That's worth considering. But there are other ways to differentiate; once you hit monk or so, you know that among those with a lot of XP are folks here who really know what they're talking about (I shan't name names, because, well, you're in the group of people who know the difference!), and others who got there simply by being around a lot (I'll give you one name for that category).

    Maybe I'm taking the "Monk" motif too seriously here. But the point is, you reach the stage of enlightenment, and you're not supposed to care any more. The Joneses become invisible, rather than something up with which to keep.

    Update it's in the same thread, so you're probably looking at it, but let me say turnstep is saying clearly the things I've been fumbling.

    Call me cranky, 'cos I'd like to promote that attitude.

    Philosophy can be made out of anything. Or less -- Jerry A. Fodor

      Yes, the XP system is fun, beccause it always pleasant to see your reputation becoming better and better (Reputation is supposed to be what others think about you afterall).
      Those new levels make new steps, new milestones in our quest of knowledge.
      But it's not a goal in itself.

      But if things go on like that, one day I'll be abbot, then bishop,
      then pontiff maybe even Saint (who knows).
      Even with my poor knowledge (that I'm trying to improve!) I'll do it.
      The problem is : I can't imagine being in the same level of merlyn,tilly,...
      (I won't say the litany of the saints but I respect them all ;-)
      worse: I can't imagine a community with 4000 saints. (It would make no sense.)
      It's only a question of respect for our saints.

      Call them new levels, call them honorific titles or whatever, for me it's the same thing:
      It's the way to keep our skillfull saints above.

      Don't steal me my 'idols', let me always watch the people I admire above.

      Anyway, can someone tell me what's wrong with those new levels, some say it's not needed, other that they're against it but nobody tell me why it is wrong ?

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://60368]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (7)
As of 2019-12-06 10:35 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Strict and warnings: which comes first?

    Results (154 votes). Check out past polls.