danger's writing style tickles me. His sentences are
thorough, well-formed crystallizations of
methodical, highly analytical thought processes.
Anyway, you are right. I haven't said much other than what
was in the original article. In fact, I worked very hard
on that article for about 4 weeks, making sure that it said
everything that I wanted it to say. And I rewrote it from
scratch a few times in the process. So, because it was an
attempt to comprehensively cover a particular topic, I am
not surprised that all I am doing now is restating parts
of the article. In the process, I am hoping that certain
things that were overlooked or not understood are becoming
clearer.
And I am disappointed that many questions in the chatterbox
have not shown up here. And I am disappointed that no one
is discussing the relative merits of these 2 modules or
other related modules.