Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

One more solution to personality voting..

by belize (Deacon)
on Apr 11, 2001 at 17:49 UTC ( #71655=monkdiscuss: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This thread is interesting to me because we are contemplating using this software to start up another type of community.

Why not do away with the -- voting all together and just leave the ++. If a node does not recieve any ++ votes, isn't that the same as a -- vote without the negative connotation and also prevents ganging up on someone because of who they are?

There are so many other issues with running a community that is vibrant and informative, but minimizing SPAM,TROLLING,FLAMING, ETC. is a very important consideration in not only the value of the site, but also in the time needed to maintain it.

  • Comment on One more solution to personality voting..

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: One more solution to personality voting..
by voyager (Friar) on Apr 11, 2001 at 17:59 UTC
    But this node says
    If a given node receives a lot of negative votes it will be noticed by me and possibly deleted.
    So you would be removing a mechanism whereby the community can deal w/trolls or otherwise inappropriate post(er)s.
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: monkdiscuss [id://71655]
Approved by root
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (2)
As of 2021-01-25 02:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Notices?