Re^5: Allowed HTML tags

"improved" is a matter of opinion. You can't for instance use a line of code and highlight a section you want to focus because there's an implicit CDATA context inside.

BTW, in HTML, PRE is a blocklevel element, while CODE is an inline element, so they aren't quite interchangable, nor can you not prepend every CODE element with PRE.

IMO, it would have been better if Perlmonks just had C for code, and left the HTML CODE as is. But, IIRC, the C was introduced later as an alias for CODE.

Comment on Re^5: Allowed HTML tags

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Allowed HTML tags by ambrus (Abbot) on Nov 27, 2008 at 19:37 UTC
You can use `<tt>` to just mark some inline html as code. Inline perlmonks code tags actually emit `<tt>` tags to the html, not `<code>` tags.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: Allowed HTML tags by belg4mit (Prior) on Nov 28, 2008 at 19:39 UTC
Hmm, I seem to recall PerlMonks used to treat inline `<c>` different from those `in their own "paragraph" i.e; preceded by \n\n` Update: `Oh, I see. Thanks tye ...glad to know I only misremembered reality rather than remembered fa +ntasy.` [download] `-- In Bob We Trust, All Others Bring Data.`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^7: Allowed HTML tags (code, newlines) by tye (Sage) on Nov 28, 2008 at 21:15 UTC
If there are any newline(s) inside `<c>` or `<code>` tags, then the contents are rendered as a block. If no newlines are included, then it is rendered in-line. It has been that way "forever". The only change (made years ago) was that a newline directly after the opening tag is now ignored (other than that it still causes the contents to be rendered as a block). - tye	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Allowed HTML tags by Anonymous Monk on Nov 27, 2008 at 18:41 UTC
Funny, you're under the impression that any of that matters	[reply]


Don't ask to ask, just ask
	PerlMonks