Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

Re: Is there a better way to learn Tk?

by renodino (Curate)
on May 08, 2009 at 17:39 UTC ( #762890=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Is there a better way to learn Tk?

As others have mentioned, Perl/Tk may not be your best solution. Have you considered Tkx ? IIRC, our friends at ActiveState are pretty actively maintaining/using it.

As for books, "Mastering" is the best bet; I once saw "Learning" described as "quite possibly the nadir of O'Reilly books"...and I concur.

Perl Contrarian & SQL fanboy

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is there a better way to learn Tk?
by pobocks (Chaplain) on May 09, 2009 at 05:52 UTC

    Do you know what the performance/requirements difference between the two packages is, by any chance? What I can find seems to indicate that Perl/Tk directly wraps the C code for Tk, whereas Tkx wraps Tcl calls Tk. I can't imagine that not causing some performance difference.

    for(split(" ","tsuJ rehtonA lreP rekcaH")){print reverse . " "}print "\b.\n";
      perl/Tk is probably faster, but Tkx is more up to date in terms of features/widgets and will run on perl 5.6.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://762890]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2021-10-28 07:22 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My first memorable Perl project was:

    Results (96 votes). Check out past polls.