Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Anonymous Monk

by Jim (Curate)
on Jan 16, 2011 at 06:53 UTC ( #882516=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Anonymous Monk
in thread Anonymous Monk?

Thank you, ELISHEVA, for your very thoughtful responses to my (all-too-na´ve) inquiry.

My only gripe with "Anonymous Monk" is that I don't know which of arbitrarily many "Anonymous Monk"s I'm conversing with when I post something on PerlMonks. That's really all there is to my question about why the decision was made by whoever runs things here to let everyone be one, amorphous, indistinct Anonymous Monk on PerlMonks.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Anonymous Monk
by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Jan 17, 2011 at 23:13 UTC
    My only gripe with "Anonymous Monk" is that I don't know which of arbitrarily many "Anonymous Monk"s I'm conversing with when I post something on PerlMonks.

    Silly me... I thought that was the whole point of anonymity.

    Sometimes a poster wants others to judge a post purely on its own merits and not on who is posting. That's one use for Anonymous Monk. They may not want to be voted down for a controversial point of view. They may not want to be voted up for something they know will be popular but for which they don't feel they deserve a lot of credit.

    Sometimes a member who is logged in takes a controversial stand. An Anonymous Monk may not want to appear to be attacking or supporting that other monk to whom they are replying just out of personal feelings about that other monk.

    Sometimes a visitor to the site wants to ask a question and get a response without signing up as a member. Perhaps he or she doesn't want the (quite small) hassle of signing up and remembering yet another password. I'd recommend a password wallet if remembering the password is the problem. Perhaps they aren't real sure who gets the information they would enter to register. Sometimes a person thinks they may never be back to a site after the one time they use it. I know I often find comment sections on other sites in which I'd comment if I didn't have to register as a member and give my email address out to some organization with which I'm unfamiliar just to comment the one time. The point in this case isn't to be anonymous but to leave your node on the site without having to meet the requirements of membership.

    The reputation of a node stands even if no XP is gained or lost by a member. You can vote a node up or down based on what it says, and people will be able to see the votes later. XP is a factor of a number of things, but a single node's reputation, especially when posted anonymously, is a pretty clear indication of what the voting membership thinks of the node. If you're voting to reward or punish members through XP, you're hurting the discussion system. Please vote on the merit of the nodes to which your votes are attached.

      My only gripe with "Anonymous Monk" is that I don't know which of arbitrarily many "Anonymous Monk"s I'm conversing with when I post something on PerlMonks.

      Silly me... I thought that was the whole point of anonymity.

      I think luis.roca's point was that it is difficult to differentiate which Anonymous Monk you are conversing with in a thread if there is more than one contributing at the same time.

        All anonymous posts could be anyone, including some monk who is a member but not logged in. Two anonymous posts claiming to be the same person may not be. Two claiming not to be may in fact be the same person. You won't know, because you won't know who made any of the posts. That's anonymity for you. Don't differentiate, because it's a false differentiation. Just accept that "anonymous" means anonymous.

        But what is the point in differentiating since the discussion is threaded, not flat?
Re^3: Anonymous Monk
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 16, 2011 at 07:03 UTC
    Since PerlMonks offers threaded discussions it is easy to follow the conversation, so it doesn't matter which one I am -- the opposite is true for the chatterbox so I am barred

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://882516]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (6)
As of 2021-05-06 06:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Perl 7 will be out ...





    Results (70 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?