Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Thoughtless voting?

by davies (Prior)
on Jan 29, 2011 at 23:34 UTC ( #885079=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Thoughtless voting?
in thread Thoughtless voting?

No. Most of the posts that make "best nodes" are too advanced for me to understand. I try to read those that I have a chance of understanding to profit from them. But if there is a node I think deserves downvoting, I will do so, wherever I find it.

It takes quite a lot for me to downvote a node, so looking at nodes that have been so heavily upvoted as to make best nodes means that doing as you describe is likely to be a total waste of time. I don't think it's a waste of time to try to ensure that people aren't discouraged from saying "thank you", so I try my best in that regard. But please don't get the impression that I haunt "worst nodes" for things to upvote. That would really waste time.

Regards,

John Davies

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://885079]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2020-04-08 15:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    The most amusing oxymoron is:
















    Results (44 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?