Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re: Experience with HTML::Mason?

by TheoPetersen (Priest)
on Jul 11, 2001 at 19:25 UTC ( #95721=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Experience with HTML::Mason?

Do some searching around this site and you'll find plenty of commentary (and even a review by somebody).

Obviously, I like Mason a lot; I find I can create very good Perl code and mediocre HTML quickly, and that's fine because I don't care that much about HTML. Those who do care (or work in environments where people care) might prefer other solutions; HTML::Template is very popular among those who keep page development and Perl code at arm's length from one another, while the Template Toolkit is more in the middle, giving the template side plenty of power (and requiring more understanding for the page developer).

But yeah, Mason works as advertised, has been used for amazing sites, and is well supported by its developers and community. Have a go :)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Experience with HTML::Mason?
by VSarkiss (Monsignor) on Jul 11, 2001 at 20:53 UTC


    The number of times I've pointed people at SuperSearch, and here I am not taking my own advice.... Thanks, Theo.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://95721]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2018-07-17 15:58 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

    Results (372 votes). Check out past polls.