Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Proposal: Have Image Macros

by kcott (Bishop)
on Jul 11, 2012 at 04:11 UTC ( #980997=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Proposal: Have Image Macros

I quite like this idea in principle. Here's a few thoughts (in no particular order):

  • The sample image you provided is perhaps a little on the large side: maybe reduce the dimensions by 25-50%.
  • Would there be any limit to the number of these you could use in a single node? My concern here is that threads could become very cluttered if this facility was abused.
  • Setting up some formal HTML class attribute names (e.g. <img class="imagemacro advicedog" ...) would be useful for those using CSS.
  • Having a minimum level is probably a good idea; although, maybe pick something lower than Friar (level 9). Perhaps choose a level that currently doesn't have any special privileges, e.g. Monk (level 7).

-- Ken

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Proposal: Have Image Macros
by jdporter (Canon) on Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 UTC

    Excellent ideas, all. Thank you!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://980997]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (8)
As of 2020-03-31 08:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    To "Disagree to disagree" means to:









    Results (180 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?