Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Proposal: Have Image Macros (Barney)

by ww (Archbishop)
on Jul 11, 2012 at 15:30 UTC ( #981164=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Proposal: Have Image Macros (Barney)
in thread Proposal: Have Image Macros

tye

I'm not sure why your reply, making much the same ultimate point ("not a really good idea") as I did is directed to me rather than to OP. It appears we agree. And I see no particular reason for thinking that my rephrasing and restatement of the wikipedia critique somehow suggests otherwise.

OTOH, thank you for "banal" -- the use of which should have occurred to me.

  • Comment on Re^3: Proposal: Have Image Macros (Barney)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Proposal: Have Image Macros (Barney)
by tye (Sage) on Jul 11, 2012 at 15:42 UTC
    No kidding.
    I'm not sure why your reply [...] is directed to me rather than to OP.

    It wouldn't make much sense to reply to jdporter's node saying "No kidding". I'm not sure where you got the idea that replies can only be done as a form of objection or disagreement.

    - tye        

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://981164]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (5)
As of 2020-04-04 00:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    The most amusing oxymoron is:
















    Results (32 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?