Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
As I said, I think "slurp" is the culprit here.
I'm fine with "spew" cause it's a general term. The "vomit" meaning is limited to human context, like in "to make someone spew". > I think all of these method names are not meant to be taken 100% seriously ;-) Yes, but wrong associations can lead to hard to debug misunderstandings. For instance wantarray is true in "list" context. This function should have been named wantlist() instead.
Cheers Rolf
In reply to Re^8: One to one file output idiom
by LanX
|
|