"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hello shmem,
> And your conclusion is? It looks to me like all those perls are pretty well behaved, including my old ones Yes it seems so. My conclusion was in Re^2: is rand random enough to simulate dice rolls?: as haukex and other said is unwise to break a test for something related to a core function which might have problems in preistoric installations. A big warning, as above, is more than nothing in case of test failure.
L*
There are no rules, there are no thumbs.. Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS. In reply to Re^4: is rand random enough to simulate dice rolls?
by Discipulus
|
|