comment on

L::U is an arch-specific module (because it has a binary component), so the new version is probably installed in a directory that contains 5.24.1/x86_64-linux-64int in its path. The much older Perl you use via "your browser" won't look in that directory because it only contains modules it can't load.

You verify this using

use List::Util;
print $INC{"List/Util.pm"}, "\n";
[download]

That said, why are testing using one build of perl, and running using another? That makes no sense. Fix your shebang line, and your problem will be solved.

In reply to Re: System vs. User module version of List::Util by ikegami
in thread System vs. User module version of List::Util by Lady_Aleena

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks