Vote your conscience. That's the best you can do.
I will give ++'s to nodes that:
- Make me think.
- Teach me something.
- Discuss something I haven't considered before.
- Bring clarity to a subject I didn't thoroughly understand.
- Help me out in some way.
- Nodes that show the person writing it has been thinking for him/herself, even if conclusions are not completely refined, and even if it's something I already knew. ...I like to see people learning, it inspires me to keep learning too.
- Make me laugh or smile.
- Are accurate.
- Iterate (or reiterate) something I find myself in agreement with.
- Followups to my nodes with constructive comments, or thank-you comments. I like to know how my ideas can be improved upon, and also like to hear if something I proposed worked.
And on occasion, I'll -- a node that:
- Is a followup by the same person who asked the original question, where the followup shows that (s)he didn't listen to the responses (s)he got.
- Is abusive or inflamatory with no redeeming value.
- Is pure troll-bait or complete electronic-grafiti rubbish (ie, posts to Q&A with nothing but a bunch of garbled meaningless text).
- Sometimes a completely inaccurate response to a question, but only in rare-extreme cases.
I try to get inaccuracies in posts resolved via discussion, and/or Chatterbox /msgs, rather than through voting. I've been making an effort to be increasingly consciensious about handling such things in the least inflamatory way possible, and usually let people know via /msg when I see a minor inaccuracy that they could easily fix in their post.
There are a thousand other cases that could warrant ++'s, and a few others that might warrant a --. I try to refrain from --'s altogether unless something is pretty extremely awful. And I like to give out ++'s as freely as possible. People come back to this site because it provides a positive reinforcement to learning. Kudos (and ++'s) to all those people.
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|