![]() |
|
Think about Loose Coupling | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I had reason to use the perl functionality built into a vendors software package today. The package comes with 5.8.3, and it's own set of perl modules to do software related tasks like tweaking data records. At one point, I have to figure out why this didn't work:
but this did:
After looking into the source code, the object and it's methods use the :lvalue attribute.
So, that doesn't work if lvalue is undef, but does work if lvalue is an empty string. Is that a 'feature' of the lvalue attribute, or something about the method? I wouldn't expect this traditional setup to work:
But I would've expected all the work behind :lvalue to fix that. Updated: Yes, I've read the pod. It's experimental. Good thing they're using it. The pod doesn't really mention what would happen in the case of setting undef though. -=Chris In reply to :lvalue, How I Hate Thee by jk2addict
|
|